Religion–state relations in the perspective of Islamic political theology: Implications for democracy and Indonesian civilization

Authors

  • Bayutama Institut Agama Islam Pemalang, Pemalang, Indonesia Author
  • Amirul Bakhri Institut Agama Islam Pemalang, Pemalang, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Islamic political theology, Religion–state relations, Democracy, Indonesian civilization, Governance

Abstract

Studies on religion–state relations in Islamic political theology remain dominated by normative debates, while research connecting theological foundations with their implications for democracy and the development of Indonesian civilization is still limited. This study aims to reconstruct religion–state relations from the perspective of Islamic political theology and examine their implications for democracy and the development of Indonesian civilization. A qualitative approach employing library research was adopted through descriptive-analytical analysis and conceptual synthesis of relevant scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that Islamic political theology is grounded in tawīd, amānah, shūrā, al-'adl, malaah, and ukhuwwah, which are reconstructed into a conceptual framework of religion–state relations. These values strengthen accountability, participation, the rule of law, the public interest, and social cohesion within democratic governance. This study contributes by proposing an integrative conceptual model linking Islamic political theology, democracy, and the development of Indonesian civilization.

Abstrak

Relasi agama dan negara dalam perspektif teologi politik Islam masih didominasi oleh perdebatan normatif, sementara kajian yang menghubungkan landasan teologis dengan implikasinya terhadap demokrasi dan pembangunan peradaban Indonesia masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi relasi agama dan negara dalam perspektif teologi politik Islam serta menganalisis implikasinya terhadap demokrasi dan pembangunan peradaban Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research) melalui analisis deskriptif-analitis dan sintesis konseptual terhadap berbagai literatur yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa teologi politik Islam dibangun atas landasan tawḥīd, amānah, shūrā, al-'adl, maṣlaḥah, dan ukhuwwah, yang direkonstruksi menjadi kerangka konseptual relasi agama dan negara. Nilai-nilai tersebut memperkuat akuntabilitas, partisipasi, supremasi hukum, kepentingan publik, dan kohesi sosial dalam demokrasi. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dengan menawarkan model konseptual yang mengintegrasikan teologi politik Islam, demokrasi, dan pembangunan peradaban Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. (1999). Demokrasi di persimpangan makna: Respons intelektual Muslim Indonesia terhadap konsep demokrasi 1966–1993. Tiara Wacana.

Abou El Fadl, K. (2004). Islam and the challenge of democracy. Princeton University Press.

Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn Ismāʿīl. (2002). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dār Ibn Kathīr.

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (1997). Min fiqh al-dawlah fī al-Islām. Dār al-Shurūq.

An-Naʿīm, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Sharīʿa. Harvard University Press.

Azra, A. (2003). The Megawati presidency: Challenge of political Islam. Dalam H. Soesastro, A. W. Budiman, & M. Soesastro (Eds.), Governance in Indonesia: Challenges facing the Megawati presidency (hlm. 119–135). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).

Azra, A. (2006). Indonesia, Islam, and democracy: Dynamics in a global context. Equinox Publishing.

Barton, G., Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). Authoritarianism, democracy, Islamic movements and contestations of Islamic religious ideas in Indonesia. Religions, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080641

Brown, G. (2019). Civic Islam: Muhammadiyah, NU and the organisational logic of consensus-making in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1626802

Connaway, L. S., & Radford, M. L. (2021). Research methods in library and information science. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Driessen, M. D. (2018). Sources of Muslim democracy: The supply and demand of religious policies in the Muslim world. Democratization, 25(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1334054

Esposito, J. L. (1998). Islam and politics (Ed. ke-4). Syracuse University Press.

Firdaus, F. R., Chandra, R. L., & Sagala, C. S. T. (2024). Meaningful participation as people’s sovereignty form in democratic rule of law state. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 31(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art5

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.

Hadiz, V. R. (2018). Imagine all the people? Mobilising Islamic populism for right-wing politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1433225

Hall, E. (2018). Integrity in democratic politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(2), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117744956

Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.

Houssaini, O. S. (2024). Integrating spirituality and politics: Insights from Islam and Christianity on religiosity and governance in contemporary society. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.70908/2232-6022/17.235-258

Jong, A., & Ali, R. (2023). Political Islam as an incomplete and contested category: A post-foundationalist revision. Religions, 14(8), 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14080980

Kadivar, M. (2020). Democracy and ethical values from Islamic perspective. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(5), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720909583

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Concepts and conceptual analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00290.x

Madjid, N. (1987). Islam, kemodernan, dan keindonesiaan. Mizan.

Maurya, S. K. (2026). Justice as a social indicator (hlm. 83–109). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10812-8_4

Muslim, ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (2006). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Dār Ṭayyibah.

Prayitno, A. (2025). Islam as a political force reading the direction of Islamic political movement in Indonesia towards democracy. Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 26(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v26i1.872

Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.

Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807.

Riza, A. K., & Bilhaq, A. R. (2025). Assessing the potential of Najm al-Din al-Tufi’s Maṣlaḥah for Islamic legal reform. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 6(5), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v6i5.488

Stepan, A. (2000). Religion, democracy, and the "twin tolerations". Journal of Democracy, 11(4), 37–57.

Tibi, B. (2008). Political Islam, world politics and Europe: Democratic peace and Euro-Islam versus global jihad. Routledge.

Whyte, S. A. (2019). Advancing shūrā: A social agent for democratization. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 30(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2019.1641375

Zuhri, A., Ramírez-Coronel, A. A., Al-Hawary, S. I. S., Dwijendra, N. K. A., Muda, I., Pallathadka, H., Amiruddin, M. M., & Sunarsi, D. (2023). Evaluation of the role of Islamic lifestyle in communication skills of Muslim couples. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8185

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

Bayutama, & Bakhri, A. (2026). Religion–state relations in the perspective of Islamic political theology: Implications for democracy and Indonesian civilization. Mishkat: Journal of Theology and Civilization, 1(1), 189-201. https://perfidiajournal.com/index.php/mishkat/article/view/65